View Single Post
Old 11-02-2012, 11:29 AM   #13
a.graham52
Premier V.I.P. Member
 
a.graham52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,979
a.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond reputea.graham52 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to a.graham52
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03glgold View Post
it varies by the year of the car...the 1999 has a 15 in the book, 2000 and 2001 is 14.3, 2002-2004 14.1...that is why there are differences in what we figure and even more reason why saying miles per tank is a bad way to tell us how your car is doing on fuel consumption I guess...I got everything except the 03 information out of the pdf manuals on the oldsmobile site, for 03 i used my print manual

just confirmed the numbers. looked up all the years in GMsi. all appears correct. learn something new everyday.
__________________
The dumbass that shows up randomly 10 years after selling the car.
a.graham52 is offline   Reply With Quote