07-27-2004, 11:08 AM
|
#1
|
|
|
Hey First try on any car for the 1/4 mile, and i did 16.547 at 83 mph ?!
is this good for a Stock 2.4l manual ?!
thanx
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 11:21 AM
|
#2
|
|
Kitteh is back!!!!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,445
|
better than me
17.003 lol
btw if your car goes slower than me, it must be burned
__________________
97 Nissan 240sx - sr20det
94 Nissan 240sx convertible
01 Suzuki gsxr 750
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 11:32 AM
|
#3
|
|
|
dude... considering your car weight... thats an excellent time !!!
lol  |
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 11:37 AM
|
#4
|
|
Kitteh is back!!!!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,445
|
yea but then again my engine isnt stock either so bleh
__________________
97 Nissan 240sx - sr20det
94 Nissan 240sx convertible
01 Suzuki gsxr 750
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
Yeah but you get back at me with the coolness of your car and chic magneting with it !
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#6
|
|
Designated Drunk
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
|
stock rims and tires?
i ran a 16.17@85.sumthin but average was about 16.35ish
__________________
I'm baaaackk
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 02:44 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
Yeah, its a Stock everywhere alero
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 03:00 PM
|
#8
|
|
Designated Drunk
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
|
what kind of temperature? head/tail wind? all factors that come into play
__________________
I'm baaaackk
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 12:09 AM
|
#9
|
|
|
mmm as i recall, humid/hot and no wind
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 12:47 AM
|
#10
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 19,932
|
i would say not bad. moh is a little slow. but weather probably had factors into that.
__________________
72 442 "THE BEAST", 99 Alero - OSV Replica w/ original OSV parts, HURST Dual/Gate Shifter
Beware of the BackStabber
 
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 08:10 AM
|
#11
|
|
Designated Drunk
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
|
temp was definately a factor...it was a bit colder here when i ran...but u shoulda ran a bit quicker, my times were with the massive chrome 18's...
__________________
I'm baaaackk
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 08:48 AM
|
#12
|
|
Aleromod part owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18,199
|
I'd say that time is OK
You said it was humid, that plays a factor with a EFI car
Did you load it up before your launch? (rev motor to about 2000 RPM before the launch)
__________________
33% ALEROMOD OWNER!!
2000 Olds Alero 3400 SFI 14.53 @ 94.93
1985 Olds Delta 88 307 SBO 17.96 @ 76.99
2007 Volvo V50 T5 6M 15.782 @ 89.12
www.facebook.com/kb0177
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 08:59 AM
|
#13
|
|
|
yeah but i had a crapy reaction time 0.5 something something
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 09:00 AM
|
#14
|
|
Aleromod part owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18,199
|
500 isn't a bad r/t for the first time with a new car
__________________
33% ALEROMOD OWNER!!
2000 Olds Alero 3400 SFI 14.53 @ 94.93
1985 Olds Delta 88 307 SBO 17.96 @ 76.99
2007 Volvo V50 T5 6M 15.782 @ 89.12
www.facebook.com/kb0177
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 09:04 AM
|
#15
|
|
Designated Drunk
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
|
isn't 500 a perfect launch?
__________________
I'm baaaackk
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 10:13 AM
|
#16
|
|
|
i dont think so... the next to me on the track abnd on the slip sheet... made a 0.156 or something close like that... damn civics... didnt beat him as a race... but on time i was faster
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 10:15 AM
|
#17
|
|
Designated Drunk
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
|
i guess there's different ways to time reaction time then...here if we got under a .500 it was a redlight...
__________________
I'm baaaackk
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2004, 10:19 AM
|
#18
|
|
|
wow loox like its early.. cuz i cant spell lol
|
|
|
|
|
08-02-2004, 03:18 PM
|
#19
|
|
GX Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 123
|
nice! yeah, that soundz like a good average time for a 2.4L .. but with manual u should go a little faster.
With a custom warm air intake, my fastest run was 16.42s.
Fusion
|
|
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 10:20 AM
|
#20
|
|
|
For reaction times, it depends on what kind of tree you are running off of. BTW, i've been runnin in the mid to high 16.1xx's recently with the 2.4l manual with knn intake and blizzaks on(haven't had time to get my toyos mounted)
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.
|
