03-17-2004, 04:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
What size is the exhaust on the alero? Looking to get a flowmaster 80 muffler, or whats the part number?
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 04:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
Exhaust is 2.25 inch stock. Not sure about the part number.
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 06:22 PM
|
#3
|
Aleromod part owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18,199
|
I have 2.5 inches on mine.
You don't want to go too big, less backpressure and you go slower
__________________
33% ALEROMOD OWNER!!
2000 Olds Alero 3400 SFI 14.53 @ 94.93
1985 Olds Delta 88 307 SBO 17.96 @ 76.99
2007 Volvo V50 T5 6M 15.782 @ 89.12
www.facebook.com/kb0177
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 10:04 PM
|
#4
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: lookin' at you in the rearview
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 3.4Alero@Mar 17 2004, 03:54 PM
Exhaust is 2.25 inch stock. Not sure about the part number.
|
WOW your's was huge. mine was only 1 7/8" ID stock hmmmm...
__________________
I'm on a boat.....
|
|
|
03-18-2004, 01:38 AM
|
#5
|
|
I'm pretty sure all alero's (V6 or i4) come with 1 7.8" stock exhaust diameter. And if you have the V6 a 2.5" exhaust is the best way to go
|
|
|
03-19-2004, 06:25 PM
|
#6
|
|
Huh, OK, maybe I was wrong. Didn't really care about the stock size. For some reason 2.25 stuck in my head. I digress.
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 10:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
stock exaust is just 2' and the part you nedd the number is 42583 for the flowmaster I suggest Jegs.com for this part payed 98.99 total with shipping to Canada so if you live in the states it should even be cheaper
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 01:21 PM
|
#8
|
|
1 7/8".
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 02:37 PM
|
#9
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Redog@Mar 17 2004, 05:22 PM
I have 2.5 inches on mine.
You don't want to go too big, less backpressure and you go slower
|
Umm, you don't go slower, maybe on the bottom end, yes, but not on the top end. It just reduces the bottom end because it gets rid of the backpressure that causes torque. Put a big exhaust on, you will gain quite a bit on the top end.
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 03:02 PM
|
#10
|
GLS member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,137
|
i got 2.5 pipes made from the cat-back with no resonator and a dynomax camaro muffler and had a noticeable power and quarter mile difference
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 05:43 PM
|
#11
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: lookin' at you in the rearview
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
Originally posted by flalero+Mar 20 2004, 01:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (flalero @ Mar 20 2004, 01:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Redog@Mar 17 2004, 05:22 PM
I have 2.5 inches on mine.
You don't want to go too big, less backpressure and you go slower
|
Umm, you don't go slower, maybe on the bottom end, yes, but not on the top end. It just reduces the bottom end because it gets rid of the backpressure that causes torque. Put a big exhaust on, you will gain quite a bit on the top end. [/b][/quote]
Umm well I was running straight header (long story) and had NOOO power even as high as 3500 RPMs in first or second, let the clutch out at ~3K, so too little back pressure will make you slower, in the sense that you will accelerate MUCH more slowly.
__________________
I'm on a boat.....
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 02:31 AM
|
#12
|
GLS member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 4,018
|
yeah uh i ordered the 60 series muffler from flowmaster and its a 2.25 and i havent installed it cause im still not even sure if it even fits.... and from what you guys are saying i dotn wanna loos acceleration i wanna gain , oh well i guess im screwed, so i'll have to put a CAI to make up for it eh?
__________________
AUTOBOT
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 03:07 AM
|
#13
|
Owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 19,932
|
less backpressure means less torque.
so this means........with not enough backpressure you have higher hp but slow ET in the 1/4
it's all about the 60ft mark and getting out of the hole.
__________________
72 442 "THE BEAST", 99 Alero - OSV Replica w/ original OSV parts, HURST Dual/Gate Shifter
Beware of the BackStabber
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 10:20 AM
|
#14
|
|
But our exhaust is restrictive from the factory, if you go TOO big you'll lose torque if your engine isnt tuned properly, but a 2.5" exhaust isnt too big for the V6 so you won't really lose any noticeable low end power.. christ you make it sound like if he gets anything bigger than a 2" exhaust his acceleration will be cut in half.
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 05:28 PM
|
#15
|
Owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 19,932
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Final-Reality@Mar 23 2004, 09:20 AM
But our exhaust is restrictive from the factory, if you go TOO big you'll lose torque if your engine isnt tuned properly, but a 2.5" exhaust isnt too big for the V6 so you won't really lose any noticeable low end power.. christ you make it sound like if he gets anything bigger than a 2" exhaust his acceleration will be cut in half.
|
i wasn't saying that. just explaining crap to you youngins
2 1/4" would work good. i think 2 1/2" would be the best.
but if you went 3" and above on n/a then that is too big
__________________
72 442 "THE BEAST", 99 Alero - OSV Replica w/ original OSV parts, HURST Dual/Gate Shifter
Beware of the BackStabber
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.
|