Aleromod.com Aleromod.com

Go Back   Aleromod.com > Performance Related > L61 2.2L Ecotec Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-03-2005, 09:19 AM   #21
ptrudel
Designated Drunk
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Liskeard, Ontario
Posts: 6,873
ptrudel is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to ptrudel
if you're really worried about the weight, just take a poop before racing the guy...


but seriously, weight in our mid 15's to low 16's cars just doesn't make a diff...i lost more weight this year at the drags then last, had smaller/lighter tires, had better mods, and still only ran 1 tenth of a second quicker
__________________
I'm baaaackk
ptrudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 12:27 PM   #22
dark_n_evil
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeSS@Jul 28 2005, 09:10 PM
Tires too make a big difference. we have 215 or 225 width tires on lightweight aluminum alloy wheels.

The cavy has what? 195 or 205 tires and heavier steel wheels
Accually the if the 03 cavalier is the ls model it came stock with 16 inch crome rims and 215/50/r16 tires. the only reason why i know is I have one.lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 06:32 PM   #23
mike2002
GLS member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,340
mike2002 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to mike2002
you guys say the alero will win because you own a alero. fact is, caviliers are 3-400lbs lighter, and all things being equal, are faster. not saying every cav will be every alero, but if you averaged every cav vs every alero, cav's are faster. there's no real argument here, same engine trans, lighter.....hmmm

not all 4cyl cav's are ecotechs. the older z24's were not ecotechs


but the real thing to remember, no stock or near stock cav or alero should be raced, because they're both slow, including my alero. racing is boring in these cars.
__________________
2001 Alero GLS - Sold!
mike2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2005, 08:45 PM   #24
Eh_nigma
the "Why Not?" Guy
 
Eh_nigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CFB Shilo, Manitoba
Posts: 1,217
Eh_nigma is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Eh_nigma
Quote:
Originally posted by mike2002@Aug 3 2005, 05:32 PM

but the real thing to remember, no stock or near stock cav or alero should be raced, because they're both slow, including my alero. racing is boring in these cars.


:o I'm going to go in the corner and cry now...
__________________
"What are you doing to your car that's taking it so long?"
-Everything
"Why an Alero?"
-Why the hell not?
Eh_nigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2005, 09:07 AM   #25
MikeSS
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,892
MikeSS is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by mike2002@Aug 3 2005, 05:32 PM
you guys say the alero will win because you own a alero. fact is, caviliers are 3-400lbs lighter, and all things being equal, are faster. not saying every cav will be every alero, but if you averaged every cav vs every alero, cav's are faster. there's no real argument here, same engine trans, lighter.....hmmm

not all 4cyl cav's are ecotechs. the older z24's were not ecotechs


but the real thing to remember, no stock or near stock cav or alero should be raced, because they're both slow, including my alero. racing is boring in these cars.

I'm saying alero's are faster because I never lost to any cavalier or sunfire when I raced. But maybe my car was a freak.

And to say that an alero shouldn't be raced because "its to slow" is STUPID. We race our cars for fun and a hobby, when we get rich and can afford Corvettes and Vipers, we'll race those. :Noooo:
__________________
2010 WRX 265 - AWD Boost
2004 RX-8 GT - Gone
2006 Cobalt SS 2.4L VVT - 15.05 @ 94.91 - Gone
1996 Camaro Y87 - Gone
2003 Alero 2.2L GX 5-Spd - 15.21 @ 88.21 - Gone
MikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2005, 02:42 PM   #26
alero_ecotec
Special Agent
 
alero_ecotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
alero_ecotec is an unknown quantity at this point
^^^ i agree, i mean hell i raced my 1st car in the Norwalk Speedway highschoo nationals a few years ago, and it was a 1992 buick lesabre...........didnt do all that bad either, consistency is key
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
alero_ecotec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2005, 03:54 PM   #27
MikeSS
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,892
MikeSS is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by alero_ecotec@Aug 4 2005, 01:42 PM
^^^ i agree, i mean hell i raced my 1st car in the Norwalk Speedway highschoo nationals a few years ago, and it was a 1992 buick lesabre...........didnt do all that bad either, consistency is key
Exactly, I race anything that has a drivetrain in it. I love racing me sea-doo on the water even if it is a slow one.
__________________
2010 WRX 265 - AWD Boost
2004 RX-8 GT - Gone
2006 Cobalt SS 2.4L VVT - 15.05 @ 94.91 - Gone
1996 Camaro Y87 - Gone
2003 Alero 2.2L GX 5-Spd - 15.21 @ 88.21 - Gone
MikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2005, 05:51 PM   #28
mike2002
GLS member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,340
mike2002 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to mike2002
[quote=MikeSS,Aug 4 2005, 07:07 AM]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike2002,Aug 3 2005, 05:32 PM
you guys say the alero will win

And to say that an alero shouldn't be raced because "its to slow" is STUPID. We race our cars for fun and a hobby, when we get rich and can afford Corvettes and Vipers, we'll race those. :Noooo:


pushing a 16 second car to its limits is stupid, because you've got your foot to the floor and its not moving to quickly. i dotn know, maybe im just really bored and tired slow cars (fastest car ive ever owned was a mid 15 second car, not fast). but i find it boring and uneventful

these cars are more fun if you mod the supsension to be able to take corners faster. i didn't do much for suspension, so it still handles like a turd, but if i was keeping the alero, thats the route id go.
__________________
2001 Alero GLS - Sold!
mike2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2005, 06:46 PM   #29
GeorgiaBoy
 
Posts: n/a
Why hasn't there been a thread about a the auto cavie vs the auto Alero? Iknow there aren't many fans of the automatics out there, but there are some that run pretty damn good!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2005, 08:18 PM   #30
shockz
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by GeorgiaBoy@Oct 19 2005, 06:46 PM
Â;-) Â;-) Why hasn't there been a thread about a the auto cavie vs the auto Alero? Iknow there aren't many fans of the automatics out there, but there are some that run pretty damn good!!!

Alright my input on this...

Thats something I actually did 2 times.

I got called out at college and knew the cars.

I raced two cavies...

1 was a 2.4 Quad 4 and the other 2.2 Ecotec

I whooped the Quad 4's but and the 2.2 Ecotec was pretty much neck and neck. I won by a narrow margin.

We all had autos.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.