![]() |
Rear 6x9's to 6.5's
Hi,
This is in my 4 door, 2003. I'm doing my install and thought I'd post some pictures along the way. I'm replacing the 6x9's to 6.5's. Made an adaptor out of 1/8" press board as seen in the pictures. It fits into the factory speaker mounting plates. |
nice. can't see why you'd want to change those though. 6x9s should be louder/more clear, depending on brand. :huh:
|
i have 6.5 polk db6500's in the rear and they sound excellent.
|
Quote:
:p Its always been my experience that any round speaker sounds better than any oval speaker. But since SQ is subjective, to each their own. A 6X9 will provide more bass. But in my eyes not as good SQ. If anyone cares to look, you will notice none of the top SQ names run any type of oval speaker. ;) |
the 5 1/4 and 6 1/2s i had in my eclipse were plenty loud.............and they were even clear..they had plenty of bass definitely far more than the 6x9s i have in my alero.
|
Which size speakers have the least bass? I have a 15inch kicker and puts out ALOT of bass.
|
Quote:
but everyone i know who loves SQ, goes for a front sound stage, and will opennly admit that the rear speakers are all but a waste. many removing them completely.... :rolleyes2: |
True,
I dont bother, unless I have no subs. Then i will consider adding 6X9 subs to give me bass and some mid fill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well "alot" is relative. What "alot" to you can be laughable to others. Furthermore, to gauge subs you can look at potential. Its not an end all be all deal, as the key factor is often mis-stated by manufacturers, but its a good general guide. Quote:
|
Quote:
Well enough it overpoweres the rest of the music. |
I can do that with stock speakers and a single 8" sub.
Like I said man its all relative. I ran a set of $620 comps that were loud as hell amped. Sometimes thats what it takes to balance against your subs. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.