View Single Post
Old 10-27-2009, 08:38 PM   #2
comanche
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 477
comanche is an unknown quantity at this point
A. That would not be good.
More costly, far less reliability, not much better fuel mileage.
Different trans, harness, radiator, and PCM.
B. The 2.2 swap is better, but still need new trans etc. And you would need access to a factory scan tool.
C. The 2.4L is one of GM's worst engines IMO.
comanche is offline   Reply With Quote