View Single Post
Old 02-10-2012, 02:50 PM   #16
AleroB888
GLS member
 
AleroB888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Knox area, KY
Posts: 2,120
AleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond reputeAleroB888 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by [ion] C2 View Post
Assuming you have the ability to intercool a roots supercharger. On my engine the GM setup was integral to the manifold. Unless you're running a liquid to air intercooler, it becomes impractical and inefficient to route piping all over the place for a positive displacement s/c.


Turbo side is pretty hot piping, engine side is pretty cool piping. IATs ambient compared to 150+ with non-intercooled supercharger. Intercoolers are amazing. Doesn't matter how how it is outside, the air going in stays pretty cool.

I stopped measuring past about 250 degrees out of the blower lol. You are right, remote intercooling the Roots blower is quite an engineering challenge, but it's been done -- the T-bird coupe was on the right track as far as drivability. But then they stuck the intercooler behind the radiator.

Unless your going to do some serious (expensive) engineering, the M62 won't keep up with a well-thought out turbo build, but especially not dollar-for dollar. I think as a convenient way to give the car some pep on the low end and stay street-legal, it's a good route to go.
__________________
2003 GL MP62 supercharged / 2004 GLS stock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVYZPbpPzk
AleroB888 is offline   Reply With Quote