02-14-2011, 11:45 PM
|
#1
|
AutoCross Alero
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,759
|
Aluminum front control arms.
are there any other benefits (besides weight) to having the aluminum control arms? my factory stamped steel control arms already have poly's installed.
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 12:17 AM
|
#2
|
AleroMoB
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lumberton, NC
Posts: 389
|
No, but I think they would be worth your while. I dont know the weight difference, its not much. 5-10 lbs.
Since the aluminum ones are lighter it means less unsprung weight on the front suspension. I dont know if that makes the handling better or worse though. With full suspension and good brakes it wouldn't matter.
__________________
2001 Oldsmobile Alero 4Dr GL2 w/ 2005 GAGT Motor

CC & PB, Tinted Tails, 3K HIDs (Lows/Fogs), GAGT Mirrors, Flowmaster Exhaust, D/S Rotors, CAI, Rockford Fosgate T400-4 T800-4, 1 15" C3, Rockford F 5.25/R 6x9
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 01:54 AM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Grove, IL
Posts: 5,002
|
I would think that they'd have to be more rigid.
__________________
Cliff Scott
2004 Alero GX w/sport pkg - Sold, living somewhere in WI now.
2011 Saab 9-5 Turbo4 M6
2004 Corvette Convertible M6
1994 Chevy Beretta - Quad4/M5
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 11:52 AM
|
#4
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Lighter is always good but I probably killed that by my choice of oversized brakes, wheels and tires. I have a set of poly bushings ready to be installed but no press at home. My hope IS that they are stiffer and complete the tightness of my front end. I guess I'll just have to wait and see....
__________________
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 03:45 PM
|
#5
|
2Screwy
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 13,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by widbyj
Lighter is always good but I probably killed that by my choice of oversized brakes, wheels and tires
|
True and you had the chance to change all of those. Lightweight wheels matched with lighter tires, and then say no to the oversized brakes....
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 06:57 PM
|
#6
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwhauck
True and you had the chance to change all of those. Lightweight wheels matched with lighter tires, and then say no to the oversized brakes....
|
I can always go back, I kept all the original stuff in case of sale or changes. Wouldn't want to go back to understeer and slow stops though...
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 07:39 PM
|
#7
|
AutoCross Alero
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,759
|
does anybody know the part numbers for the energy suspension or prothane front control arm bushings?
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 08:26 PM
|
#8
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
"Prothane 7-234" says "GM J-Body Front C-Arm Kit 95-04"
This looks correct but cannot verify until my arms get here (car has stock parts atm). I believe I got this set through MPRacing...
|
|
|
02-15-2011, 08:41 PM
|
#9
|
GX Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 81
|
This is what I weighed them at when I did mine:
Stamped steel arm (with stock bushings and ball joint) 7.8 lbs
Aluminum arm (with poly bushings and ball joint) 6.4 lbs
A weight savings of 1.4 lbs per side.
If you have the steel arms with poly bushings, I wouldn't bother as I feel your money would be better spent elsewhere.
|
|
|
02-16-2011, 06:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01GrandAm
This is what I weighed them at when I did mine:
Stamped steel arm (with stock bushings and ball joint) 7.8 lbs
Aluminum arm (with poly bushings and ball joint) 6.4 lbs
A weight savings of 1.4 lbs per side.
If you have the steel arms with poly bushings, I wouldn't bother as I feel your money would be better spent elsewhere.
|
Agreed.
The only reason I have aluminum LCAs is because I wanted poly bushings.....and tejohnson was selling his.
|
|
|
02-16-2011, 09:23 PM
|
#11
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01GrandAm
If you have the steel arms with poly bushings, I wouldn't bother as I feel your money would be better spent elsewhere.
|
Agreed.
However I'm well on the way to having the most expensive Malibu ever - Jokes on me!
|
|
|
02-17-2011, 02:01 PM
|
#12
|
GL Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grafenberg, Germany
Posts: 826
|
The reason for the aluminum control arms - is the transient behavior and eigenfrequency of aluminum compared to steel.
The fact that they weight less then the steel is normally an indication that they arent as "strong" as steel ones, but the fact that they are cast instead of stamped (steel) they are probably stronger or as strong as, in the parts where it counts.
What you'll gain from OE aluminum CA is a quieter, less NVH ride compared to steel.
I felt it in my own hands and butt - as I changed my 99 al. CA to stamped aftermarket steel ones (ripped my ball joint boot - couldnt get a replacement for the al. ones) - no I feel minor road inconsistencies more and stronger then before.
So from an engineering point of view - you'll ride better with OE aluminum CA.
__________________
Thanks Julian
1979 350SB Chevrolet Camaro Project Thread
1995 Chrysler Stratus LX
1999 3.4L Oldsmobile Alero ( resource page)
2002 Nissan Primera with CVT
|
|
|
02-17-2011, 03:08 PM
|
#13
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by falloutboy
So from an engineering point of view - you'll ride better with OE aluminum CA.
|
Thank you very much for the explanation!
I thought there was an engineering reason for the improvements but wasn't sure. My degree is Electrical Engineering, not Mechanical... I really didn't think that the slight weight reduction itself would do much for me, I've already added weight through larger wheels, wider tires and bigger brakes.
Curious though, you mention not being able to find a replacement ball-joint boot, will I have trouble finding the proper ones here also? I was thinking of putting new joints in before installing the arms... Also, would glass-bead blasting and then powder-coating be worth doing, they put corrosive slime on roads around here in winter?
Thanks again!
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 05:56 AM
|
#14
|
GL Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grafenberg, Germany
Posts: 826
|
Moog NOW has balljoints for al. Arms - but they are more expensive than the ones for steel.
bead blasting would be a good thing - seals the surface. If powdercoating al. Arms is possible or wise, you have to ask a professional powder coater.
Although the A-Arms dont get "much" damaged by the corrosive winter stuff, more in danger are all other steel and painted stuff down there.
Sway bar, struts, bolts, nuts and so on.
__________________
Thanks Julian
1979 350SB Chevrolet Camaro Project Thread
1995 Chrysler Stratus LX
1999 3.4L Oldsmobile Alero ( resource page)
2002 Nissan Primera with CVT
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 11:18 AM
|
#15
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Can you tell me exactly what year/vehicle the aluminum arms originally came on? My dealership parts connection could not find any difference in the ball joints listed, cost about $80 each. I don't want to order the wrong ones and then have to pay restocking.... Thanks
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 01:40 PM
|
#16
|
GL Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grafenberg, Germany
Posts: 826
|
I only have a 99 LA1 - but I heard that the early Aleros had 'em - later not.
according to Rockauto
MOOG Part # K6701 - Frt Susp; Lower; w/Aluminum control arm - €41.71
MOOG Part # K6527
Frt Susp; Lower; w/stamped steel control arm - €41.79
__________________
Thanks Julian
1979 350SB Chevrolet Camaro Project Thread
1995 Chrysler Stratus LX
1999 3.4L Oldsmobile Alero ( resource page)
2002 Nissan Primera with CVT
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 02:35 PM
|
#17
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
FYI - Aluminum Control Arms may be found on:
Any 2005 GrandAm
'99 to '04 GrandAms & Aleros - This was according to Rock Auto and is WRONG
1999 Malibus only, early production - GM dealer research
Still available new for $280 each at dealer, steel is less than $100
The proper ball joints are different although the price is only $0.10 different here.
I'll check at the stealership and post their prices for comparison... Too high to bother with and are inferior to the new Moog design
Last edited by widbyj : 02-19-2011 at 03:09 AM.
Reason: Updated info
|
|
|
02-19-2011, 01:15 AM
|
#18
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Grove, IL
Posts: 5,002
|
I have definitely only seen the parts listing from GM for '99s
I have a new one sitting in the garage...
__________________
Cliff Scott
2004 Alero GX w/sport pkg - Sold, living somewhere in WI now.
2011 Saab 9-5 Turbo4 M6
2004 Corvette Convertible M6
1994 Chevy Beretta - Quad4/M5
|
|
|
02-19-2011, 03:15 AM
|
#19
|
GL Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central WA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff8928
I have definitely only seen the parts listing from GM for '99s
|
You are correct sir. My dealership connection verifyed this today. Not used in production due to cost cutting. Some failures reported, replace with steel in warranty. Highly recommended to have them glass bead blasted, this is supposed to toughen the surface and reduce/prevent cracking. I'm looking forward to giving them a try very soon...
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 PM.
|