04-13-2008, 12:25 AM
|
#1
|
GX Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 108
|
Rear 6x9's to 6.5's
Hi,
This is in my 4 door, 2003.
I'm doing my install and thought I'd post some pictures along the way.
I'm replacing the 6x9's to 6.5's.
Made an adaptor out of 1/8" press board as seen in the pictures. It fits into the factory speaker mounting plates.
Last edited by BeeMain : 04-30-2008 at 11:42 PM.
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 09:49 AM
|
#2
|
Gone
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lockport Ny
Posts: 19,244
|
nice. can't see why you'd want to change those though. 6x9s should be louder/more clear, depending on brand. 
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 11:21 AM
|
#3
|
AutoCross Alero
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,759
|
i have 6.5 polk db6500's in the rear and they sound excellent.
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 12:50 PM
|
#4
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 4,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cherrington17
nice. can't see why you'd want to change those though. 6x9s should be louder/more clear, depending on brand. 
|
Its always been my experience that any round speaker sounds better than any oval speaker.
But since SQ is subjective, to each their own.
A 6X9 will provide more bass. But in my eyes not as good SQ.
If anyone cares to look, you will notice none of the top SQ names run any type of oval speaker. 
__________________
-Ryan
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 06:37 PM
|
#5
|
Aleromod's most pointless thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jersey (north and south are 2 diff. states)
Posts: 2,349
|
the 5 1/4 and 6 1/2s i had in my eclipse were plenty loud.............and they were even clear..they had plenty of bass definitely far more than the 6x9s i have in my alero.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam337
whats with all the useless threads lately?..
|
New project 1992 460 big block ford notchback mustang
Goal - Mid 11s all motor.
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 08:25 PM
|
#6
|
GL Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 473
|
Which size speakers have the least bass? I have a 15inch kicker and puts out ALOT of bass.
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2008, 11:37 PM
|
#7
|
Gone
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lockport Ny
Posts: 19,244
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan from Ohio
Its always been my experience that any round speaker sounds better than any oval speaker.
But since SQ is subjective, to each their own.
A 6X9 will provide more bass. But in my eyes not as good SQ.
If anyone cares to look, you will notice none of the top SQ names run any type of oval speaker. 
|
but everyone i know who loves SQ, goes for a front sound stage, and will opennly admit that the rear speakers are all but a waste. many removing them completely.... 
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 12:21 PM
|
#8
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 4,072
|
True,
I dont bother, unless I have no subs. Then i will consider adding 6X9 subs to give me bass and some mid fill.
__________________
-Ryan
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 02:25 PM
|
#9
|
I drive a JEEP!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salisbury, Maryland
Posts: 6,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicX
Which size speakers have the least bass? I have a 15inch kicker and puts out ALOT of bass.
|
Where did  come from?  LMAO!!
__________________
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 07:02 PM
|
#10
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 4,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicX
Which size speakers have the least bass? I have a 15inch kicker and puts out ALOT of bass.
|
Well "alot" is relative. What "alot" to you can be laughable to others.
Furthermore, to gauge subs you can look at potential. Its not an end all be all deal, as the key factor is often mis-stated by manufacturers, but its a good general guide.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car Audio Central FAQ's
The formula uses the SD of the driver and the one way XMAX to figure total air displacement.
Sd = Effective piston radiating area of the driver. Roughly equal to the area of the cone plus 1/3rd of the surround. Measured in CM^2
Here is the formula:
SD (in CM^2) * XMAX (IN CM) * 2 / 1000= Displacement in Liters.
To get MM to CM simply move the decimal to the left 1 place. So 32MM = 3.2CM
Now for an example.
What will have more potential? 8- 8" Resonant Engineering RE series or a single Resonant Engineering 15" SX sub?
RE8
SD 195
Xmax 1.2CM
195*1.2*2/1000= .468 Liters per
.468*8= 3.744 total Liters of Displacement
SX15
SD 810
Xmax 2CM
810*2*2/1000= 3.24 total Liters of Displacement
Now that you have an effective tool to determine what scenario has better potential I wish you luck!
|
__________________
-Ryan
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 08:15 PM
|
#11
|
GL Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan from Ohio
Well "alot" is relative. What "alot" to you can be laughable to others.
|
Well enough it overpoweres the rest of the music.
__________________
|
|
|
04-14-2008, 10:53 PM
|
#12
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 4,072
|
I can do that with stock speakers and a single 8" sub.
Like I said man its all relative.
I ran a set of $620 comps that were loud as hell amped. Sometimes thats what it takes to balance against your subs.
__________________
-Ryan
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.
|